History and Beginnings
Saint Edmund, located on Avenue T in Brooklyn, was the very first LabLearner school in the Diocese of Brooklyn and Queens. It was installed on August 31st, 2016. Since this first installation of a LabLearner STEM lab and full Kindergarten-grade 8 curriculum, an amazing 38 other Diocesan elementary schools have joined the LabLearner STEM movement!
STEM is an acronym for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. STEM does not simply accentuate the basic importance of teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics across the entire precollege spectrum of grade levels, but inherent in the STEM concept is that these subjects be taught in an integrated, coordinated manner.
Consequently, the teacher needs not only grade-level understanding of the concepts, skills, and methods of each of the STEM areas (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math), but must also be able to see, understand, and teach the interrelationships between these subjects, and the strong influence they have on each other.
This is not a simple task. But there is a logical, research-based way to move forward and be successful with high quality STEM education. That way is LabLearner, and due to the foresight of its donors and leadership, the Diocese of Brooklyn is well on its way to taking a national lead in quality STEM education.
LabLearner Schools
The Problem
STEM and STEM education are widely recognized topics of interest for educators, parents, business, and governments globally. This is because success in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) is directly associated with other forms of success at many levels. STEM drives economies upward. On an international level, STEM success is a common ingredient of strong and highly competitive nations. Consequently, most adults are interested in STEM and STEM education for one good reason or another – perhaps parents of schoolchildren most of all.
Out of 100 STEM occupations, 93% of them had salaries well above the national average. The average for STEM career annual salaries is $87,570, whereas the average for non-STEM jobs is roughly half that ($45,700)1, 2. Add to this, projections indicating substantial future growth in STEM jobs (13% increase in STEM jobs between 2017 and 2027, compared to 9% for non- STEM jobs)1, 3. Since 1990, employment in STEM fields has grown nationally by 79 percent, from 9.7 to 17.3 million4.
While we may care about STEM, how are our students actually doing in STEM subjects compared to their peers globally? Not very well. U.S. students placed 38th of seventy-one countries in mathematics, and only 24th in science on the Program for International Student Assessment (PIZA) exam5.”
Although 48% of the 2.1 million 2016 high school graduates who took the ACT exam stated an interest in STEM majors and careers, only a quarter of the students who took the test (26 %) met or surpassed the ACT College Readiness Benchmark in STEM7. That is, most test-takers were not prepared in the U.S. PreK-12 education system to pursue university science courses without difficulty and/or remediation.
The Solution
To avoid these abysmal numbers and improve their students’ chances of STEM success, the Diocese of Brooklyn – Dr. Tom Chadzutko (Superintendent) and Dr. Liz Frangella (Associate Superintendent for Curriculum) – began implementing the LabLearner science program in its schools. In four short years, Diocesan leadership has brought LabLearner science to 39 of its schools. Current Diocese of Brooklyn schools are shown in the list here.
Referneces
- Ryan. The State of STEM Education Told Through 12 Stats. iD Tech Blogs & News. November 2019.
- Fayer, S., Lacey, and Watson, A. STEM Occupations: Past, Present, and Future. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 2017.
- Economic Modeling Specialists International, April 2017.
- Graf, N., Fry, R., and Funk, C. 7 Facts About the STEM Workforce.
Fact Tank News in the Numbers, Pew Research Review, January 2018. - Desilver, D.U.S. Students’ Academic Achievement Still Lags Behind That of Their Peers in Many Other Countries. Fact Tank News in the Numbers, Pew Research Review, February 2017.
- STEM Education in the U.S. Where We Are and What We Can Do/2017. ACT Research, 2017.
LabLearner: Consistently Ahead of the Curve
LabLearner, since its inception, has operated from the school of thought that a hands-on approach best cultivates classroom science aptitude among its students. With our interactive approach and a focus on scientific concepts, LabLearner goes well beyond the expectations of science standards in laboratory skill development, metacognitive strategy development, and cross-disciplinary correlations with Common Core Math and ELA standards.
Next Generation Science Standards
From a science content perspective, LabLearner is very well aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). This, in turn, results in excellent LabLearner alignment with most state science education standards since NGSS has been extensively used as a model for state standardized science tests.
CCSS Mathematics and ELA Standards
While it might be expected that LabLearner covers national and state science education standards comprehensively, it is also important the extent to which it aligns with Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA).
To examine the alignment of LabLearner with NGSS and CCSS Math and ELA at each grade level from kindergarten through eighth grade, use the tabs below.
NY State P-12 Science Standards
The LabLearner program began aligning its STEM curriculum to the NY P-12 Science Learning Standards in 2017 as soon as the new Science Learning Standards were released and the implementation process within the state began. The NY Department of Education established a transition phase allowing schools several years to develop curriculum that would align with the NY P-12 Science Learning Standards. The deadline for full implementation is August 2021. Beginning June 2022, 5th and 8th graders will take the new NY P-12 Science Learning assessments.
Schools in New York state that implemented the LabLearner program beginning in the 2017-2018 school year had a science curriculum that was immediately aligned with the new NY P-12 Science Learning Standards. Students in these schools have been immersed in the new standards for several years and are effectively ahead of the curve for implementation and assessment of the NY P-12 Science Learning Standards.
More
Even though standardized science education tests may influence the content of science curricula, most educators and neurocognitive researchers agree that science should primarily be taught in a hands-on, experiential fashion. This is where LabLearner truly excels. Not only do LabLearner students get complete NGSS and NY State P-12 Science Standards-aligned science content, but they also outshine other students in the acquisition and proficiency of science skills and problem-solving practices.
Results
Assessment and Testing
LabLearner has been in use in some 30+ states for nearly two decades. While this provides a rich archive of experience, it also presents assessment issues shared with every other educational program. This is because, not only do state science education assessments differ from one state to another, but also the assessments themselves change within any one state from time to time – often too frequently. It is therefore difficult to make clear, scientific assessments over time or between locations. This fluidity of assessments creates significant challenges in nearly all aspects of basic PreK-12 education, not just science and mathematics. This is the major reason why we are proposing section 6 of this proposal (Assessment and Continuous Improvement). Nonetheless, there are a number of current types of assessments that document LabLearner’s success wherever it is chosen as the STEM education system.
Blue Ribbon Schools
The U.S. Department of Education, National Blue Ribbon Award is one way to assess the academic impact of a curriculum or program. The Blue Ribbon is widely considered the “highest honor a school can achieve”. This is because the Blue Ribbon is not just a measure of minimal compliance or simple standardized test scores. It is a much more comprehensive assessment, involving a multiplicity of objective criteria that allows teachers, students, parents, and community representatives to assess the school’s strengths and weaknesses and develop strategic plans for the future. Based on such criteria, few schools that apply for the award even receive the mandatory site visit for Blue Ribbon consideration. Roughly only between 2 – 4% of schools have been awarded a National Blue Ribbon since the program’s founding in 1982. However, nationally, approximately 20% of LabLearner schools have achieved the Blue Ribbon award – that is five to ten times the national average!
Pre-/Post-Test Assessments
The PreK-8 LabLearner program consists of some 60-plus individual science units called Core Experience Learning Labs (CELLs). Each CELL takes approximately four or five weeks for a class to complete, working in teams of four to six students. In grades one through eight, students complete a pre-test, taken before the CELL begins and a post-test, taken at the end of the CELL.
Pre-/post-test assessments are fixed response evaluations where identical questions presented in an adjusted sequence are asked in both the pre-test and post-test documents. Questions on the pre-/post-tests reflect the science concepts taught within the investigations of a CELL. Questions require students to apply their knowledge of CELL concepts to new situations, interpret experimental results from a table, graph, or mathematical formula, and correlate experimental observations with scientific concepts.
In a study conducted with 1,268 public school students from grades one through six, student performance from pre-test to post-test in grades one through six increased by an average of 40%. Comparison of pre- and post-test scores using the Student’s Paired t-test indicated that the improvement in students’ comprehension of science and math concepts taught in the CELLs was statistically significant (p<0.0001) for CELLs in all grade levels. In addition, analysis of the scores (p<0.05) suggested that there was no statistically significant difference on pre/post-test performance based on student gender or the specific teacher facilitating the CELLs. The LabLearner curriculum itself and the LabLearner approach, is clearly the major factor for these impressive increases in science performance.
The graphic shown here is indicative of similar studies. This study illustrates the increase in student LabLearner post-test performance in grades one through eight. In general, differences in student comprehension between pre- and post-test tend to increase as students move from primary to intermediate grades. The increase in performance is maintained through the middle school grades, a time in which U.S. schools tend to demonstrate a decrease in student science comprehension. These results are typical for LabLearner schools and illustrate the significant impact of the LabLearner program on student comprehension of scientific concepts.
Standardized Science Assessments
There is a large variety of standardized tests that U.S. public and private schools use to assess students in science. LabLearner schools across the U.S. utilize standardized tests such as the Virginia Standards of Learning (SOLs), the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAPs), the Standard Achievement Test 10th edition (SAT 10), the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS), and many others. Representative examples of standardized science testing in LabLearner schools from across the country are briefly summarized below.
Loudoun County Public Schools in Northern Virginia, with funding provided by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, began incorporating LabLearner experiments into their curriculum in 2004. Prior to implementation of the LabLearner program, Loudoun students scored in the mid- to high-90th percentile on the Virginia’s Science Standards of Learning (SOL). In the nine years following the addition of the LabLearner program, Loudoun students continued to achieve consistently high SOL science scores (mid-high 90th percentile). Science supervisors within the district have indicated that not only is the LabLearner program an important component of the continued excellence of science scores on the SOLs, but it is also responsible for the increase in inquiry-based learning and experimental design seen in their students.
The Handley School in Saginaw, Michigan uses the MEAPs, the science assessments taken by all public schools in the state of Michigan, to evaluate the science proficiency of their students. In 2001, the Handley school adopted the LabLearner program. Scores from the 2004 MEAPs indicated that 67% of students at the Handley School scored as advanced in science whereas by 2008, 86% of students scored as advanced. In 2009 and 2010, the Handley School reported that 100% of its students met or exceeded levels of proficiency in science as compared to the state average of 78%. Finally, in 2017, with the LabLearner lab forming the base of the elementary science program, Handley School was awarded the National Blue Ribbon for excellence in education.
The Wood Acres School in Marietta, Georgia began implementing the LabLearner program in 2006. Wood Acres students score at 92% in the science Stanford Achievement Test (SAT 10), a test whose normed average is 50%.
The Wood Acres School emphasizes that the LabLearner program provides a “science-math connection that is strong throughout the program and provides students with the tools to become independent researchers with problem-based projects.”
Blessed Sacrament School in Burlington, North Carolina began implementing the LabLearner program in 2006 as well. Blessed Sacrament assesses student learning outcomes in all subject domains using the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS). Blessed Sacrament consistently scores in the upper 20% nationally in Science. In 2012, for example, students achieved a National Percentile Rank of 83%. The figure to the right shows a longitudinal analysis of ITBS score improvement during the first three years of LabLearner implementation for a 4th grade cohort. Notice that while improvements occurred during the first year of the program (5th grade versus 4th grade results), the greatest progress occurred after 3 years of LabLearner implementation (7th grade results). This is typical of LabLearner standardized test scores, likely as the result of the spiraling nature of the LabLearner curriculum.
St. Patrick’s NYS Test Scores
The impact of any new academic program takes some time to be felt. We have only recently begun to obtain data from the Diocese of Brooklyn schools. The St. Patrick Catholic Academy in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn implemented LabLearner for the 2017 school year. The dramatic increase in standardized NYS scores shown below was taken directly from the homepage of their website – the results speak for themselves.
Listen to the Experts
Sometimes the best way to really find out how well an academic program works is simply by talking to teachers, principals, and administrators in schools that use it. By this criteria, LabLearner excels like few other programs. Below is an example communication from a teacher expressing the opinion and support typical of the LabLearner program. Additional testimonials from LabLearner principals, teachers, and students can be read at the bottom of this and other pages.
This is our fourth year using the LabLearner program at The Academy of Our Lady of Mount Carmel. Our grades have steadily improved both during the school year and on standardized tests. This indicates to me that LabLearner not only delivers content knowledge, but it also delivers the skills to comprehend and analyze any scientific information presented in standardized tests. Students know how to read data tables, interpret graphs, and analyze experimental procedures and results. It is challenging, and they rise to the challenge.
In the first half of our first year with LabLearner, I often heard “what do I need to know for the test?” Once students came to understand that we were focusing on exploring, experiencing, and proving concepts through hands-on investigation they stopped asking that question. They haven’t looked back! Students know that they are expected to think more deeply, to make predictions, to develop and practice their skills of analysis and investigation, and to apply their understanding to real-life situations. They know how to identify problems and find solutions to those problems. They also know that the more effort they put in, the more they get out of the LabLearner program.
Each year now, I’ve had high school students come back and thank me for the experiences they had with LabLearner in middle school at The Academy of Our Lady of Mount Carmel. Each one has told me how much it gave them a leg up for high school science. They know how to use the equipment, proper lab procedures, and best of all, how to think.
I run lab investigations for preK-3 students up through 8th grade. Every week I hear from parents of all age children how much their children love Science. I hear stories of students “turning around” and loving Science because of how they experience it at The Academy of Our Lady of Mount Carmel. While I certainly will take some credit, the majority of the credit must go to LabLearner for the richly engaging program they provide.
Public Relations
Meetings and Conferences
Since 2017 there have been a number of national meetings and conventions of the National Catholic Education Association (NCEA) in which talks featuring work in the Diocese of Brooklyn have been featured. Some of the major talks are highlighted below:

Bringing STEM to an Inner-City Diocese: How to Effectively Implement a Major Initiative
Dr. Thomas Chadzutko, Diocese of Brooklyn
Dr. Keith Verner
Catholic Leadership Summit and The Academy 2017
Tempe, Arizona
October, 2017

Critical Thinking: Can We Really Make Our Students Smarter?
Dr. Paul Eslinger, Penn State College of Medicine
Dr. Keith Verner, LabLearner
NCEA National Convention
Chicago, Illinois
April, 2019

Bringing STEM to an Inner-City Diocese
Dr. Thomas Chadzutko, Diocese of Brooklyn
Dr. Elizabeth Frangella, Diocese of Brooklyn
Dr. Keith Verner, LabLearner
NCEA National Convention
Cincinnati, Ohio
April, 2018

STREAM and the Science of Learning
Dr. Keith Verner, LabLearner (Keynote address)
2019 NCEA New Directions STREAM 3.0 Convention
Parsippany, NJ
June 2019
Publications
Within the past couple of years, two major articles (that we are aware of) have been written regarding the LabLearner STEM initiative in the Diocese of Brooklyn. The first page of each of these articles is shown below. One article appeared in The Tablet in 2017 entitled STEM Education to Boost Hands-On Learning. The other article that recently appeared (2019) in NCEA’s national publication Momentum, is entitled STEM Education and Teacher Professional Development in Brooklyn/Queens.
The Book, BrainSTEM: Understanding Why STEM Instruction Works, was publishd in 2019 by the National Catholic Education Association. It was written by LabLearner founder Dr. Keith Verner and describes many of the neurocognitive underpinnings of the LabLearner program in the Diocese of Brooklyn.